Where to from here?
– We don’t need newspapers, but we certainly need journalism
The economics of conventional publishing are being bulldozed by the internet and the ease of information sharing.
But the new digital age of freewheeled information only serves to raise the importance of masterful storytellers and a system rewarding their endeavor.
Commentator Clay Shirky puts it so: “Society doesn’t need newspapers. What we need is journalism.
For a century, the imperatives to strengthen journalism and to strengthen newspapers have been so tightly wound as to be indistinguishable. That’s been a fine accident to have, but when that accident stops, as it is stopping before our eyes, we’re going to need lots of other ways to strengthen journalism instead.”
So, if the old model is broken, what will work in its place? Shirky says nothing will work. “There is no general model for newspapers to replace the one the internet just broke. With the old economics destroyed, organisational forms perfected for industrial production have to be replaced with structures optimised for digital data. It makes increasingly less sense even to talk about a publishing industry, because the core problem publishing solves — the incredible difficulty, complexity, and expense of making something available to the public — has stopped being a problem.
“For the next few decades, journalism will be made up of overlapping special cases. Many of these models will rely on amateurs as researchers and writers. Many of these models will rely on sponsorship or grants or endowments instead of revenues. Many of these models will rely on excitable 14 year olds distributing the results. Many of these models will fail. No one experiment is going to replace what we are now losing with the demise of news on paper, but over time, the collection of new experiments that do work might give us the journalism we need.”




